samedi, 11 février 2012|
 

How Western media interfered dramatically in Iran’s elections

After the death of 7 or 8 people on Monday night in Tehran, Iran banned foreign reporters from covering the events on the streets and confined them in their bedroom’s hotels. From the very beginning of the election, Iran has been quite suprising and open to the Western media letting them free to report and to capture pictures ; despite the fact that those Western media were openly pro Moussavi. They were anything but Ahmadinejad.

Even Christiane Amanpour who was asked the question of freedom of press reports and activities in Tehran, on sunday, confessed that everything was OK. Can we trust a better person than Christiane Amanpour in such circumstances where freedom, war and conflicts are at stake in the world ? Of course no.

So, what happened in between ? Precisely between Monday and Tuesday when Iran decided to ban foreign reporters from coverage ? To answer that question, we need to go back to the campaign process, for what we are witnessing now in Tehran, is the direct consequence of the way western media manipulated Iranian’s opinion as far as the youth and the Iranian’s people connected to the rest of the World are concerned ; that’s to say pro Moussavi voters.

First, Western media have slipped down to the Manichean outlook of Good and Evil reversing the extremist Islamic rhetoric of Great Satan - which was previously referring to the United States during the Ayatollah Khomeiny Islamic Revolution starting in 1979.

In this presidential campaign, Ahmadinejad was that Great Satan and Moussavi the angel of change : the Reformist, forgetting that the man was a previous Prime Minister during the Ayatollah regime. If he was that Reformist Western media wanted to sell the Iranian’s people, we would have already seen the results since then. Mir Hossein Moussavi has been the last Prime Minister of the Islamic Republic of Iran, from October 1981 to August 1989, under President Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the actual Supreme Guard which is in fact the highest function in Iran. A kind of King without a kingdom.

How Western media portrayed Ahmadinejad to fit the suit of the Evil ?

First of all, they insisted - following Israelis leaders - in the fact that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a holocaust denier which is The greater sin ever of mankind. Greater than Jesus Christ crucifixion. Constant highlighting of this view by Western media turned Ahmadinejad into a Nazi similar to Hitler, the dictator.

Look what is said now by the pro Moussavi demonstrators : they want to oust the dictator and to end a dictatorship. They are using the same rhetoric that Western media suggested them. Moussavi, itself is using the word tyranny. The question then is : why all those people didn’t express themselves long time ago ; let say since 4 years of Ahamdinejad’s rule ? Does that dictatorship occur just after the rule of Prime Minister Moussavi ? Where was Mr. Moussavi to shout that openly as he is doing now ?

Denying holocaust is not refusing to acknowledge that 6 millions Jews were killed either in gas chambers or through other means such as starvation ; disease ; bad treatments, deportation process, misery, etc.. Definitely, this fact - whether exaggerated or not - has already been acted by History and nobody can change that. Holocaust has gained the status of an institution. A dramatic period of mankind. This is OK.

 We are willingly blind to the fact that israel who had suffered such a nightmare is repeating the same process with the Palestinien people

So coming back to that huge event is very significant because it pointed out something else that we, as the World, do not want to see or seem to be blind of. We are willingly blind to the fact that israel who had suffered such a nightmare is repeating the same process with the Palestinien people. And now that Israel is standing on the stronger side, its leaders are ruling Palestinien territories as ghettos, entering and controlling the people at the many many check points every where around what are supposed to be Palestinien borders.

Israel wants to reduce Palestiniens into slavery just as Israelis people were in Egypt and in Irak. Israel is renewing the process of confining people in small poor areas, underdeveloped, miserable and dependent to the Master of the Land : Israel. Just as the Jews were treated in Nazis camps. It looks as if Israel is willing to take a revenge on its 2 000 years of malediction through its mastering of Palestinien people.

The missing point is that as Israel is convinced that its land is the promise one related in the Bible ; the land the Allmighty God promised them, Israel must also recognize that, in the Bible, the pains they had suffered are a result of God sentence in the Bible. A lasting pain.

Listen to what Benjamin Netanyahu is proposing as a Palestinien state. A ghetto under Israeli control. An entirely control of the airspace ; the trade : nothing and nobody can enter or get out without crossing Israeli checking and scrutiny. No army. As a Master speaking to his slaves, Benjamin Netanyahu declared that the priority for Palestinians People was economic development which Israel is willingly to cooperate under a regional development framework. Israel has already planned the future of the Palestinians.

Really, who can accept that ? Nobody. Who can even think of such a dominion upon another country ? A real dictatorship power. Indeed, a sick one. What are the western media saying about that ? Did they compare Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu to a new Hitler, a dictator or a Nazi such as they did concerning Ahmadinejad ? Who is the colon ? Who is oppressing other people ? Who is enslaving people ? Who is the executioner there in the Middle East ? Who is keeping Palestinien people in misery ?

 The process of informing people must be a complete, a right and a fair one ; not that partial and manipulated one we are fed of.

May be there is a new international rule which goes like this : you are free to oppress, to enslave and to exploit the weakness ones or to keep the weak in misery conditions since those people are foreigners or belong to other countries, "races" and so forth. That is what Geneva [Durban II] was about, 2 months ago hosting a conference over racism called by the United Nations. By the way so many developed countries failed to attend that conference. Ahmadinejad made a strong speech against Israel occupation and Western countries delegations who were present protested the speech going outside during the speech.

But guess what : the day after, Iranians congratulated their President in Tehran ; they came massively at the airport to praise him for the speech, saying clearly how proud they were - may be lucky - having such a great President able to confront the powerful Israel, alone in the face of the entire World. During the Iranian campaign we were told exactly the opposite by the Western media ; that Ahmadinejad didn’t have supporters inside the country. Where is the true ?

We were told that Iranians complain about the fact that President Ahmanidejad is diminshing the image of a Great Iran in the international field by pursuing its nuclear program. Where is the true ? An Iran nuclear power depends definitely on the allowance of a Palestinien State or not.

The fight of Palestiniens people for freedom and for a state is something every man and woman ; every country ; every channel ; every group ; every community ; every leader ; every youth of the world and in the Muslim or the Arab World should put in first place on his agenda. No emergency surpasses the fate of Palestinans people.

That’s why Ahmadinejad is so important, so keen and so straight. That’s also why - no matter the issue of the partial recounting votes - Ahmadinejad is great because he is telling the World that enough is enough ; he is telling them that they are wrong accomodating with Israelis politics of settlements and refusal of a Palestinian State.

By the way, Israel was granted the promise land by the United Nations in 1947. Where is the United Nations now to establish a Palestinien State ?

By the way, did the International Atomic Energy Agency conducted any investigation inside Israel to verify whether Israel possesses a nuclear bomb or not ? We are told that Israel has one for sure. Many inquiries in Iran and nothing in Israel. Did western media insisted on that selective process of the international institutions inside countries ?

Did Al-Arabiya said that ? If Al-Arabya is there to say the same thing Western media are telling, then let Western media speak for all the World. Let Western media tell what they consider the whole true ; the only vision the entirely world should submit to. The process of informing people must be a complete, a fair and a right one ; not that partial and manipulated one we are fed of.

No matter that culture and societies are different and have different backgrounds as far as democracy is concerned, institutions implementations and the operative system ; symbolism ; figures of authority ; ethnics conflicts, social balances - Western media want every country to meet Western standards.

The fact is clear. If israel wants peace, he will be granted security. If not, options are opened even war. That is fair.

The other fact is. Israel has been accusing Hamas of perpetrating terrorists attacks for many many years now and for not recognizing the existence of Israel as a nation. Right. But that course can be reversed into another simple one : if Israel agrees for the establishment of a Palestinien State and retires from the settlements in Palestinien territories, then israel will discover that peace is as simple like that ; by implementing justice, humanity, generosity and respect.

Next to come. Part 2 : The western standard. Are western democracies free from critics ?

We recommend. Ahmadinejad, the path of healing and peace. And also "wipping off Israel of the map" a french translation of the interview of Larry King with Mr. President Ahmadinejad during the presidential campaign in United States.


Forum sur abonnement

Pour participer à ce forum, vous devez vous enregistrer au préalable. Merci d'indiquer ci-dessous l'identifiant personnel qui vous a été fourni. Si vous n'êtes pas enregistré, vous devez vous inscrire.

[Connexion] [s'inscrire] [mot de passe oublié ?]

 
A propos de Scène Publique Internationale
Sans réagir sur le fond des motifs du mandat d’arrêt international du Président Soudanais : crimes de guerre et crimes contre l’humanité, l’Union Africaine a pourtant manifesté son extrême prudence pour cette condamnation d’un de ses membres. Raison avancée : la sécurité et la paix doivent primées sur la (...)
En savoir plus »
Thèmes

Visiteurs connectés : 3